With recent speculation of Liverpool facing a potential £50m transfer offer from PSG for our number one striker Daniel Sturridge, the question was asked on our brilliant WhatsApp LFC group yesterday about the pros and cons of whether we should continue with the brilliant but fragile striker or sell reason being we cannot guarantee his continued fitness.
It brought about a lively debate and here are the highlights:
Pros to keeping Sturridge
- Best striker in Premier League outside of Aguero
- Clinical goal scorer when fit
- Fantastic at linking up with similarly skilled attacking players i.e. Coutinho/Firmino
- Currently 47 goals in 81 games (excellent 58% goal scoring ratio)
- Approaching his peak years which if he stays we will see the very best of his talent
- It will show that we are no longer a selling club (Suarez, Sterling, Torres to name a few….)
- Injury prone for the best part of two seasons so the club haven’t been able to get the best out of his great goal scoring talent
- Tendency to complain/sulk about being subbed when sometimes its in his own health’s interest to substitute him
- Not emotive when Liverpool score – does not celebrate with other team mates when they score
- It will strengthen a European rival if he left
Read the debate and add your comments.
Momo – To be honest I don’t see much effort from Sturridge maybe its because he’s scared of being injured but I don’t see the drive he had when he was part of the great SAS but no doubt he is still a quality player just needs to put up more of a fight when playing.
Momo – I’m a big of a Sturridge fan but that is a lot of money
Kop-Post – Replace him with?
Momo – At £50 million there’s a lot of options I’d love us to put in a bid for Reus and maybe even Hernandez.
RP – I would like to keep Sturridge, he still has brilliant moments that can decide a match – but if he prefers PSG, let him go, don’t carry a dog to the hunt. Klopp has proven to be able to detect strikers and develop them up such as Lewandowski or Aubameyang who nobody knew before.
Momo – Or Lacazette
DG - £50m for a 26 year old(soon to be 27), with not the best fitness record would be a great result. I love Studge and think he is quality but I just cannot see him keeping for a long period. He is bound to get injured and we need our main striker to offer more games. His goal scoring record is great but if he gets another injury, do you think we can ever get that sort of offer from another club again? I think we should sell him for £50m if that offer is on the table.
Fran – As for Sturridge I would keep him but on condition he’s willing to improve and not strop when subbed. But if he wants to go then help him pack and get in another. Doesn’t have to be a big name but a work horse not diva that can assist and score
Billy – As for Sturridge tough call for that price, with all that injury pros and mind over matter you have to think. Bottom line for me is if he wants to go than we should not hold him back, because he will sulk more. If he wants to stay that’s all good
Edet – Not long ago we were looking for who will take Sturridge off our book due to the scale of his injury. I think £50m is too tempting an offer to turn down very lightly. Rupert – But money doesn’t score goals and win trophies
DG – Well he hasn’t won trophies and he has not necessarily scored much since his return (I know I am being harsh as his record when he has played is amazing) But …….. £50m could get us money to buy a Hernandez (I think he is great for the fast football we play) and another striker to replace him.
DG – The reason we replace Sturridge is that Benteke will go and Origi for me is not an out and out striker
Fran – I think the club has proven that no one is a sure fit. We can name names but doesn’t guarantee they’ll be great when they arrive. Leicester are a good example that you don’t need big names, just skill and a heart to play. I’m tired of a lot of players at the club and want a good clear out. Who to replace them with I don’t know but I know a few just got to go. First out of the door should be Martin Skrtel
DG – I agree that you don’t need big names I suggested Hernandez earlier only because he has a proven EPL goal scoring record and although he was never the main striker at Man Utd, he always worked extremely hard. That is exactly the type of player we need in that position, someone who will work hard and make constant runs into the box. That is one of the reasons that Benteke has not been a success for us plus the fact that he has forgotten how to put the ball in the back of the net for us when he is one on one with the keeper and I can no longer put it down to confidence
KP– That’s true to an extent but bigger clubs tend to go for bigger signings. If we had bought Vardy or Mahrez can you imagine the furore by LFC fans. When we spend £25 million fans are normally upset we didn’t spend £40/50 million. Basically whatever we are spending we have to buy better players. I said at the time we’d be sorry for not buying Delli Alli. Sell Sturridge and bring in certified goals and that goes for Benteke too
DG – I don’t think that a true fan would challenge how much that is spent on a player if he performs. Well I personally don’t. e spent £20m on Markovic and £32 million on Benteke but what difference did they make. If Liverpool ended up signing a £4-5m I wouldn’t be upset that we didn’t spend £30-£40m. Its better that the club didn’t splash out a stupid money just for a name. But of course , the way the football market is, when your team does get a player that cheap, you as a fan automatically assume that if the player was so good how did we get him so cheap. It is then for the player to prove his worth
KP– It happens all the time with our fans. Pure fan power brought Robbie Fowler back to the club. What we need is real class. Leicester are doing great but this is a freak year. Huge television money means everyone has hung onto their players come next season now if Leicester are still the business then wow. But you know the big guns especially City with Pep on the scene will break the bank. Hernandez at Liverpool as a number one striker……..not for me
Karl – Daniel Sturridge, for me is the best striker in the Premiership, bar Aguero. He’s excellent – deadly when in the zone. If we sold him, we wouldn’t miss him because we haven’t had him play for us in the past two seasons. Everyone has their price – I’m not keen on buying former Man Utd players so Hernandez is a no-no for me. Keeping Sturridge is fine by me as long as we get at least 30/35 games a season from him. But what we need is to ensure that we no longer need to rely on his brilliance and get someone in to do the business. Unlikely to be Double Origi or Benteke, regrettably or Ings
DG – I don’t question Sturridge’s ability. He is deadly when in the zone (as long as its not on his right foot lol) But as I said earlier, sometimes you got to take up these offers when the player has huge injury problems as he does. Fair enough on Hernandez but I just see him as having the right qualities for what we need. To me, if we were to get him it’s United’s loss for letting him go and I couldn’t care less where he played before if he gives his all for Liverpool and plays with his heart. Some players like Evra, Vidic, Giggs, Roy Keane etc; I could never take to Liverpool but to me – Hernandez is not in that category…. Totally agree that if we do let Studge go, the likes of Origi and Benteke or Ings will do the business and we definitely will need a proper goal scorer
KP– As I said, I don’t want him at our club. Not special/good enough to be fronting up as the number 1 striker. The key thing with a potential £50 million windfall is I have never seen a club rebuilding or building a stadium hand back full transfer fees to a manager – no matter the rhetoric been spun about transfer fees not being affected
Ultimately, further discussions will I assume take place before Sturridge flies out with England for the Euro’s – I hope he stays and we get to appreciate his fantastic skills and sensational scoring ability as a LFC player because he could become a LFC legend should he stay fit and keeps scoring regular goals.
A figure of £50m for a player that has not played regularly is a massive carrot being dangled in front of us – it is now a massive test of character and our trust in Klopp and co.
Time will tell which way this debate will sway but it will no doubt continue until the end of this season.